Comments on: A Public Response to a Not-Published Comment

By: Flora Reia

Flora Reia — Wed, 13 May 2009 23:38:53 +0000

Thank you. You are an angel.

By: Chuck

Chuck — Sun, 18 Jan 2009 05:33:15 +0000

Thanks for this and the “Much Ado…” posts, Tim. I think your “don’t panic” message sums it up. Fortunately, I’m not in a position where I need to worry about how the proposed changes might affect me–I plan to be here in California for some time. But as retirement age approaches, it’s something interesting to watch.

…Chuck

P.S. I’m glad I got to see La Paz Waterfall Gardens on my trip to CR last July (and especially glad I didn’t go earlier this month!). I saw some more earthquake photos online–what a tragedy. Time to go find a good web site that’s accepting donations.

By: Vidagringo

Vidagringo — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:17:50 +0000

I have been told by many long time residents that nothing gets done very rapidly in Costa Rica. I think I will take their sage advice!

By: Richard Noah

Richard Noah — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:30:53 +0000

hmmm… all weirdness aside, does anyone know the bottom line, for sure ???

I am hoping to retire in CR in 2 years at 985 per month (gov pension)
I really hope THAT rule stays as is…

By: Tim

Tim — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:22:19 +0000

You are 100% correct! I was both in a hurry and in a crummy mood… both not good when one should be proofing. My apologizes! Corrections made.

By: Jay Willette

Jay Willette — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:19:07 +0000

Unscrupulous people ‘prey’ upon others, but seldom, in my experience do any ‘praying’… and

“readers value my opinion and many (reply).. upon it”
perhaps some do reply, but more likely, they rely upon it..

Sorry, but I have big problems with poorly proofed copy.. only Jay Brodel seems to be able to get away with even more egregious editorial blundering; actually the very worst I have ever seen in a commercial enterprise.. and most of it completely avoidable.. JW